← Back to reading

What a GBIF occurrence map shows

In brief

A GBIF occurrence map displays published records of organisms, such as specimens and field observations. A point tells you that a source reported an organism at a place and time; it does not count every individual there. First check which taxon, place, dates and record types the query includes. [1]

Evidence for this statement

Source-based explanation

Where to check this statement

guide-source-1
Official data types, checks and limitations, not an audit of all field datasets.
Read the section →
Save, investigate and check this version

Editorial draft · human review pending

Ask about this material
On this page

Read and explore

Three counts answer different questions. The source-record count concerns the whole query. Map aggregates group records for display at the selected scale. Loaded details are the part of the result currently retrieved. A list of one hundred rows does not mean there are only one hundred observations worldwide. Read the query conditions and the counter's explanation together.

[1] [2] [3]
Evidence for this statement

Source-based explanation

Where to check this statement

guide-source-1
Official data types, checks and limitations, not an audit of all field datasets.
guide-source-2
Official data types, checks and limitations, not an audit of all field datasets.
guide-source-3
Official data types, checks and limitations, not an audit of all field datasets.

Many records in one area can reflect more collecting or reporting rather than more organisms. A blank area does not establish absence. Comparing abundance or changes over time requires information about how and where people searched, which ordinary occurrence records may not provide.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Source-based explanation

Where to check this statement

guide-source-2
Official data types, checks and limitations, not an audit of all field datasets.

Quality flags help locate questionable coordinates, but need interpretation. GBIF distinguishes issues such as invalid coordinates, a 0/0 location and a mismatch between country and coordinates. Known uncertainty is separate information. A hidden or generalized location should not be turned into an invented precise address.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Source-based explanation

Where to check this statement

guide-source-3
Official data types, checks and limitations, not an audit of all field datasets.

Try a fixed query

Worked example: open Picea glauca in the EcoGenesis atlas and keep the species identity fixed. Choose a country and year range; note whether records without dates are included. Compare the query total, displayed map aggregates and rows loaded for one area. Open one original record and write down its dataset, basis of record, event date, coordinate uncertainty and licence. Record the query settings before comparing another area; do not treat a denser display as a population estimate.

Evidence for this statement

EcoGenesis learning activity

    Add a molecular relationship

    Now require a linked protein record. The map concerns organisms with a confirmed molecular relationship in EcoGenesis. A particular marker is not thereby a sequenced sample. Save the query and area, restore the research and check that the same conditions return.

    Evidence for this statement

    EcoGenesis learning activity

      Check the conclusion

      Check your understanding. An empty area can mean a lack of matching published data. A denser map for a later year can reflect changes in recording. Neither alone establishes population decline or growth.

      Evidence for this statement

      EcoGenesis learning activity

        Views of one query

        Different views of the same query conditions; loaded rows do not measure total coverage.

        Evidence for this statement

        EcoGenesis learning activity

          Teaching diagram · open a label to read its explanation
          1. Full query

            Preserve the exact taxon, period, geography, record type and quality filters. Results belong to that query, not to the species’ entire distribution.

          1. Aggregated layer

            The overview layer aggregates records for display. Visible-marker count need not equal record count; a missing marker does not establish an organism’s absence.

          1. Selected-area details

            Open actual records for the selected area. Check basisOfRecord, date, coordinates and uncertainty, dataset, author and licence. Preserve source unavailability as a technical limitation.

          • Full query → Aggregated layer: Overview of the selected result
          • Aggregated layer → Selected-area details: Inspect records without changing identity

          Worked result with invented teaching counts

          Suppose a fixed query matches 2,400 published records, the current map groups them into 12 displayed aggregates, and the detail list has loaded 100 rows. These invented numbers mean three things: 2,400 matches to this query, 12 display groups at this scale, and 100 details currently available to inspect. They describe neither 12 organisms nor 100 records worldwide. Even with equal query settings, a denser map alone does not establish greater abundance. Replace the teaching values with the live counters when you run your own query.

          Evidence for this statement

          EcoGenesis

            Continue with an organism

            The photographs and molecular record come from separate source materials.

            Your research question

            Save the article to return to your question and this source version.

            Plan a test

            This is your research plan. Completing these fields does not confirm a hypothesis.

            Ask about this material

            Sources and versions

            Editorial draft · human review pending

            1. GBIF dataset classes

              2026-09-19 · Terms of use on source site

              Provenance and original
              Source version
              Page checked 19 September 2026; no immutable provider release asserted
              Source reading scope
              Official data types, checks and limitations, not an audit of all field datasets.
              Location in the original source
              Official data types, checks and limitations, not an audit of all field datasets.
            2. GBIF's biodiversity data-use course

              2026-09-19 · Terms of use on source site

              Provenance and original
              Source version
              Page checked 19 September 2026; no immutable provider release asserted
              Source reading scope
              Official data types, checks and limitations, not an audit of all field datasets.
              Location in the original source
              Official data types, checks and limitations, not an audit of all field datasets.
            3. GBIF issues and flags

              2026-09-19 · Terms of use on source site

              Provenance and original
              Source version
              Page checked 19 September 2026; no immutable provider release asserted
              Source reading scope
              Official data types, checks and limitations, not an audit of all field datasets.
              Location in the original source
              Official data types, checks and limitations, not an audit of all field datasets.
            Inspect structured data
            Content version
            8bc5e8c654712bf42024d0b183146a2cf26c8b0c6b46e1fbd9152f715bea650b
            Source version
            guides-20260919@cd1e4a0a6f0c71995fb6e076b59bd2ee930c2104150357fab50fc56f5f6e80fe
            Updated
            2026-10-01