← Back to reading

species · Editorial draft · human review pending

Arabidopsis thaliana

Sign in to save
On this page

Introduction

Arabidopsis thaliana is a small annual flowering plant in the mustard family, Brassicaceae.

[1]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

It is both a wild plant of open ground and an experimental organism used to study plant growth and gene function.

[1]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

How to recognize the plant

A young plant forms a low rosette of leaves, followed by an upright flowering stem with fewer, smaller leaves.

[1]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

The basal leaves are often spoon-shaped and hairy, while the upper leaves are narrower and attached without a stalk.

[1]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Its small flowers have four white petals, four sepals and six stamens.

[1]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

After flowering, narrow fruits called siliques hold small reddish-brown seeds.

[1]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Reproduction and the annual cycle

Arabidopsis is predominantly self-fertilizing: pollen from a plant can fertilize its own flowers.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

This is sexual reproduction through pollen and fertilization, rather than the production of seed without fertilization.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Research on different Arabidopsis accessions has linked self-fertility to independently arising changes in the system that otherwise rejects self-pollen.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

The annual plant eventually produces seed and dies, but its seasonal schedule is not a single fixed calendar.

[1]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

In studied wild populations in Sweden and Italy, seeds germinated in autumn and plants overwintered as rosettes before flowering.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Flowering occurred earlier in the Italian population than in the Swedish population, illustrating why a local life cycle needs its environmental context.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where it grows and how populations differ

Kew places its native range across temperate Eurasia and into the mountains of tropical Africa, with introductions elsewhere.

[1]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Recorded habitats include rocky or sandy open ground and disturbed places such as gardens and railway margins.

[1]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

A five-year reciprocal-transplant experiment compared plants originating from one Swedish and one Italian population at both home sites.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

The local plants had higher reproductive fitness in eight of ten site-by-year comparisons, with no significant difference in the other two.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Here fitness was estimated from fruit production per planted seed or seedling, so the result describes those populations and that measure rather than every Arabidopsis population.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Why researchers use it

Arabidopsis research connects changes in genes with measurable changes in an entire plant, including its growth and developmental timing.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Boyes and colleagues established a growth-stage approach using Columbia plants and selected mutants, pairing early seedling observations with measurements of soil-grown plants.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Such comparisons distinguish a change in development from a difference caused merely by observing plants at different stages.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Self-fertilization experiments and field transplants show two complementary uses of the species: testing reproductive mechanisms and examining adaptation in natural environments.

[2] [3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Reproductive mechanism and experimental scope

Boggs and colleagues introduced the Arabidopsis lyrata SRKb–SCRb gene pair into selected Arabidopsis thaliana accessions to test restoration of self-incompatibility.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Their pollination assays assessed pollen-tube responses, and restoration differed between accession backgrounds.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

This links a reproductive phenotype to a particular recognition system without treating all accessions as genetically identical.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

What the field experiment establishes

The reciprocal-transplant study used one maternal line from each of two populations, with seeds planted in the first three years and seedlings in the final two.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Differences in survival and reproduction supported local adaptation, but the experiment was not a survey of all native populations.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Comparing developmental observations

The Boyes study combined a two-week seedling platform with soil-based measurements extending for approximately two months.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

These are experimental observation windows, not a species-wide promise of the number of days from seed to seed.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

The accessible publisher abstract identifies the study design but does not supply the detailed stage tables, so no stage-specific day counts are asserted here.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Continue exploring

Sources and versions

Editorial draft · human review pending

  1. Kew POWO · urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:277970-1

    2026-09-06 · Record components differ: flora/profile CC BY-NC-SA 3.0; backbone CC BY 3.0; individual photo copyright.

  2. PLOS Genetics · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000426

    2026-09-06 · Publisher states Creative Commons Attribution License; exact version not resolved here.

  3. New Phytologist/Wiley · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04112.x

    2026-09-06 · Free access is not a blanket reuse license; no figures/data redistributed.

  4. The Plant Cell/Oxford Academic · 10.1105/TPC.010011

    2026-09-06 · © 2001 American Society of Plant Biologists; standard publication model.

Inspect structured data
Content version
4f7727b5e690eae6459d643397dd8bf0151b0d0049f8b981ce8003174596d06a
Source version
editorial-source-set.v1@dd5966b3d611d5896e6d85adac2d1b11bc22fb250d571db56d0a22b18e29b76e
Updated
2026-09-06

Where this organism has been observed

Explore observations on the map →

Observations and connections with other organisms

Marine and community observations, and interactions reported in research. Each source retains its own records and query scope.

Research about this organism

01 · A place in the living world

Classification

Explore the tree of life
  1. DomainEukaryota (Chatton, 1925) Whittaker & Margulis, 1978
  2. KingdomPlantae
  3. SubkingdomPteridobiotina Britton & Brown
  4. PhylumTracheophyta
  5. ClassMagnoliopsida
  6. OrderCapparales Juss. ex Bercht. & J.Presl
  7. FamilyBrassicaceae Burnett
  8. SubfamilyBrassicoideae Prantl & Karl
  9. TribeArabidopsideae Al-Shehbaz, Hendriks, M.Koch, F.Lens, Lysak, C.D.Bailey, Mumm. & D.A.German
  10. GenusArabidopsis (DC.) Heynh.
  11. SpeciesArabidopsis thaliana

02 · From organism to molecules

Genes, genomes and proteins

Start with the prepared FLC dataset: chromosome 5 and linked NCBI, UniProt and InterPro records. The molecular data refers to NCBI record 3702 and retains its source versions.

Genes and transcripts

FLC · AT5G10140

1 gene · 1 transcript · 7 exons

Explore gene →

03 · Continue exploring

Tools and connections

04 · EcoGenesis

What the available evidence supports

Classification and name provenance; a source-attributed description; source records for FLC, its transcript and protein with verified versions.

A catalogue name does not establish a genome, protein or measurement. Missing records do not mean a trait or gene is absent from the organism.

Coverage updates as this page checks its sources.

Sources and licences

SourceIDLicenceDetails
Catalogue of Life / ChecklistBankG26RSource record ↗
Wikipedia37138CC-BY-SA-4.0Description version ↗