← Back to reading

Plantae

In brief

Mosses, ferns, conifers and flowering plants illustrate the diversity of land plants. Their life cycles alternate between a spore-producing generation, the sporophyte, and a gamete-producing generation, the gametophyte. The developing embryo receives protection and nourishment from the maternal gametophyte. The size and prominence of these generations differ among groups. [11]

Evidence for this statement

EcoGenesis

Where to check this statement

biology55-S06
Introduction, adaptations, alternating generations and embryo protection; Plantae boundaries remain classification-dependent.
Read the section →

Photographs and illustrations

Save, investigate and check this version

Editorial draft · human review pending

Ask about this material
On this page

Plants: growth and alternating generations

Reading this page

Land-plant features provide an introductory example here. Check the stated classification source for the boundaries of Plantae, including the treatment of algae; a land-plant feature cannot automatically be assigned to every taxon on the page. A rosette, an individual leaf and a mature flowering plant are different views of an organism.

Evidence for this statement

EcoGenesis

    Try it

    Compare the life cycles of Arabidopsis and a spruce. Open the Arabidopsis leaf next and distinguish observed structures from a teaching model and its assumptions.

    Evidence for this statement

    EcoGenesis

      Overview

      Broadly defined, plants include green plants, red algae and glaucophytes, with land plants forming only one branch.

      [1]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P01
      Abstract; Main; Integrated analysis; Land plants and angiosperm discussion; textual figure captions 1–4; publication metadata. Figures and supplements not inspected.

      Mosses, liverworts, hornworts, lycophytes, ferns and seed plants represent different branches of land-plant evolution, not successive stages in the life of one organism.

      [1]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P01
      Abstract; Main; Integrated analysis; Land plants and angiosperm discussion; textual figure captions 1–4; publication metadata. Figures and supplements not inspected.

      Bodies built in different ways

      Protected embryos, vascular tissues, roots, seeds, flowers and fruits arose in different plant lineages; none occurs in every group.

      [1]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P01
      Abstract; Main; Integrated analysis; Land plants and angiosperm discussion; textual figure captions 1–4; publication metadata. Figures and supplements not inspected.

      The liverwort Marchantia polymorpha illustrates a body plan very different from a flowering tree: its conspicuous generation is the gametophyte, while its short-lived sporophyte develops attached to the female plant.

      [2]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P03
      Abstract; Background; Figure 1 caption only; initial Results on sampled tissues and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Did not adopt the outdated basal-liverwort phrasing.

      Even an underwater flowering plant can retain familiar organs: the eelgrass Zostera marina has roots, leaves and flowers, although it lives submerged in seawater.

      [3]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P05
      Abstract; Main on habitat and sequenced material; stomata, epidermal exchange and salinity discussion; rights paragraph. No figures or supplementary data inspected.

      How photosynthetic plants obtain energy

      Photosynthesis uses light to produce sugars and other energy-rich compounds that support growth.

      [4]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P06
      The Science, The Impact, Summary, Publications; primary funder explanation of its supported research, not a new kingdom-wide experiment.

      In oxygen-producing photosynthesis, the protein machinery called Photosystem II extracts electrons from water, releasing oxygen in the process.

      [4]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P06
      The Science, The Impact, Summary, Publications; primary funder explanation of its supported research, not a new kingdom-wide experiment.

      The primary plastids of green plants, red algae and glaucophytes trace their origin to an ancient partnership between a eukaryotic cell and a cyanobacterium.

      [5]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P02
      Abstract and Introduction, including plastid ancestry, 43 single-cell genomes, Picozoa and competing evolutionary interpretations.

      Carbon absorbed from the atmosphere during photosynthesis can enter plant biomass and, later, soil; decomposition returns some of that carbon to the atmosphere.

      [6]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P07
      Main explanatory text on photosynthesis, biomass, soil, decomposition and combustion; entire short explanatory page read.

      Reproduction: two generations, not just a seed

      Land-plant life cycles alternate between a diploid sporophyte and a haploid gametophyte, both of which are multicellular.

      [2]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P03
      Abstract; Background; Figure 1 caption only; initial Results on sampled tissues and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Did not adopt the outdated basal-liverwort phrasing.

      The sporophyte produces spores through meiosis; spores develop into gametophytes, which produce eggs or sperm through mitotic divisions.

      [2]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P03
      Abstract; Background; Figure 1 caption only; initial Results on sampled tissues and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Did not adopt the outdated basal-liverwort phrasing.

      Fertilization joins egg and sperm to form a zygote, from which the next sporophyte develops.

      [2]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P03
      Abstract; Background; Figure 1 caption only; initial Results on sampled tissues and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Did not adopt the outdated basal-liverwort phrasing.

      In Marchantia, sperm swim to the female reproductive structure, and the resulting sporophyte remains dependent on the female gametophyte.

      [2]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P03
      Abstract; Background; Figure 1 caption only; initial Results on sampled tissues and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Did not adopt the outdated basal-liverwort phrasing.

      Marchantia can also reproduce without fertilization through small vegetative propagules called gemmae, formed in cups on the plant.

      [2]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P03
      Abstract; Background; Figure 1 caption only; initial Results on sampled tissues and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Did not adopt the outdated basal-liverwort phrasing.

      Not every plant feeds in the same way

      Field dodder, Cuscuta campestris, is a parasitic flowering plant that winds around a host instead of developing the familiar combination of proper leaves and roots.

      [7]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P04
      Abstract; Introduction; Karyology and genome characteristics; Figure 1 caption text, not its image.

      Its attachment organs, called haustoria, penetrate host tissue and connect with the host’s transport system, allowing access to water and other compounds.

      [7]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P04
      Abstract; Introduction; Karyology and genome characteristics; Figure 1 caption text, not its image.

      Its low photosynthetic activity is associated with losses of genes needed for high photosynthetic performance, rather than evidence that it is not a plant.

      [7]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P04
      Abstract; Introduction; Karyology and genome characteristics; Figure 1 caption text, not its image.

      At a very different scale, a single-cell genomic study placed the marine, non-photosynthetic Picozoa near red algae and found support for the absence of plastids in this lineage.

      [5]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P02
      Abstract and Introduction, including plastid ancestry, 43 single-cell genomes, Picozoa and competing evolutionary interpretations.

      Plants in water and on land

      Green plants occupy both land and water, with diverse structures and physiology.

      [1]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P01
      Abstract; Main; Integrated analysis; Land plants and angiosperm discussion; textual figure captions 1–4; publication metadata. Figures and supplements not inspected.

      Seagrasses demonstrate that a flowering-plant lineage can return to marine life and form the foundation of productive coastal ecosystems.

      [3]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P05
      Abstract; Main on habitat and sequenced material; stomata, epidermal exchange and salinity discussion; rights paragraph. No figures or supplementary data inspected.

      In Zostera marina, gas exchange occurs through the leaf surface, and the genome study found the loss of the stomatal gene repertoire associated with its submerged lifestyle.

      [3]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P05
      Abstract; Main on habitat and sequenced material; stomata, epidermal exchange and salinity discussion; rights paragraph. No figures or supplementary data inspected.

      Plants also connect biological growth with the carbon cycle: carbon storage in living vegetation is not necessarily permanent, because decay and combustion can release it again.

      [6]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P07
      Main explanatory text on photosynthesis, biomass, soil, decomposition and combustion; entire short explanatory page read.

      Why plant diversity matters

      Plant diversity underpins agriculture, while aquatic plants help sustain coastal ecosystems.

      [1] [3]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P01
      Abstract; Main; Integrated analysis; Land plants and angiosperm discussion; textual figure captions 1–4; publication metadata. Figures and supplements not inspected.
      evidence:P05
      Abstract; Main on habitat and sequenced material; stomata, epidermal exchange and salinity discussion; rights paragraph. No figures or supplementary data inspected.

      Comparing lineages rather than constructing a composite organism

      The 2019 One Thousand Plant Transcriptomes study combined transcriptomes from 1,124 sampled species with published genome resources to investigate relationships across green-plant diversity.

      [1]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P01
      Abstract; Main; Integrated analysis; Land plants and angiosperm discussion; textual figure captions 1–4; publication metadata. Figures and supplements not inspected.

      Its nuclear and plastid analyses disagreed at some nodes, so a classification list should not be treated as a fully resolved evolutionary tree.

      [1]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P01
      Abstract; Main; Integrated analysis; Land plants and angiosperm discussion; textual figure captions 1–4; publication metadata. Figures and supplements not inspected.

      What the reproductive example establishes

      The Marchantia investigation compared DNA methylation across vegetative, reproductive and sporophyte tissues of one liverwort species.

      [2]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P03
      Abstract; Background; Figure 1 caption only; initial Results on sampled tissues and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Did not adopt the outdated basal-liverwort phrasing.

      That design supports comparisons among stages in Marchantia, not a claim that every plant has the same methylation pattern or the same relative sizes of its two generations.

      [2]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P03
      Abstract; Background; Figure 1 caption only; initial Results on sampled tissues and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Did not adopt the outdated basal-liverwort phrasing.

      Separate habitat adaptation from general plant properties

      The Zostera study sequenced material from a clone collected in southwest Finland and interpreted gene losses in the context of a marine flowering plant.

      [3]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P05
      Abstract; Main on habitat and sequenced material; stomata, epidermal exchange and salinity discussion; rights paragraph. No figures or supplementary data inspected.

      The result does not imply that all aquatic plants lack stomata or that a leaf from any marine organism is a seagrass leaf.

      [3]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P05
      Abstract; Main on habitat and sequenced material; stomata, epidermal exchange and salinity discussion; rights paragraph. No figures or supplementary data inspected.

      The Cuscuta study combined genome assembly and annotation with the biology of a shoot parasite; its conclusions about nutrient acquisition belong to that host-dependent system.

      [7]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P04
      Abstract; Introduction; Karyology and genome characteristics; Figure 1 caption text, not its image.

      A boundary case for photosynthesis-based definitions

      The Picozoa analysis used 43 single-cell genomes from natural samples and supported a position within Archaeplastida near red algae and rhodelphids.

      [5]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P02
      Abstract and Introduction, including plastid ancestry, 43 single-cell genomes, Picozoa and competing evolutionary interpretations.

      The authors considered alternative histories involving complete plastid loss or a different pattern of plastid acquisition, rather than demonstrating one settled history of every archaeplastid plastid.

      [5]
      Evidence for this statement

      Editorial synthesis

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:P02
      Abstract and Introduction, including plastid ancestry, 43 single-cell genomes, Picozoa and competing evolutionary interpretations.

      Identity

      Scientific name

      Plantae

      [8]
      Evidence for this statement

      Source annotation

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:ID01
      taxon_rows[taxon_id=P]: scientific_name, taxon_rank, taxonomic_status, nomenclatural_code, classification_scope; source_row 3700653

      Taxonomic rank

      kingdom

      [8]
      Evidence for this statement

      Source annotation

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:ID01
      taxon_rows[taxon_id=P]: scientific_name, taxon_rank, taxonomic_status, nomenclatural_code, classification_scope; source_row 3700653

      Provider status

      accepted

      [8]
      Evidence for this statement

      Source annotation

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:ID01
      taxon_rows[taxon_id=P]: scientific_name, taxon_rank, taxonomic_status, nomenclatural_code, classification_scope; source_row 3700653

      col identifier

      P

      [8]
      Evidence for this statement

      Source annotation

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:ID01
      taxon_rows[taxon_id=P]: scientific_name, taxon_rank, taxonomic_status, nomenclatural_code, classification_scope; source_row 3700653

      Classification

      Source lineage

      1. Eukaryota (Chatton, 1925) Whittaker & Margulis, 1978 domain
      2. Plantae kingdom
      [9]
      Evidence for this statement

      Source annotation

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:BL01
      sections[id=classification].claims[label=Source lineage] and [label=Source classification release]; full list and release object read

      This is the source’s classification, not an inferred species phylogeny.

      Source classification release

      Inspect structured data
      classification semantics
      provider_source_classification_only
      phylogeny
      False
      release
      COL26.7 Base, 2026-07-14
      Source
      Catalogue of Life / ChecklistBank
      source sha256
      891457d62af389842924ef1de8bd6fbbdf9f6b03428ef5dd487bed4d04c0ace0
      metadata reports source sha256 verified
      True
      source sha256 independently recomputed in this delivery
      False
      verification scope
      Saved scientific JSON release metadata; installed exact row additionally read
      [9]
      Evidence for this statement

      Source annotation

      Where to check this statement

      evidence:BL01
      sections[id=classification].claims[label=Source lineage] and [label=Source classification release]; full list and release object read

      This is the source’s classification, not an inferred species phylogeny.

      This group in the catalogue

      The installed Catalogue of Life places Plantae at the rank of kingdom. Accepted record col:P belongs to COL26.7 Base, 2026-07-14. The authored scientific name is retained alongside the shorter name; navigation uses the record identifier.

      [10]
      Evidence for this statement

      EcoGenesis

      Where to check this statement

      classification55-P
      Installed classification: exact record, ancestor path and direct-child count. This is not a new phylogeny or a biological review.

      The immediate parent here is Eukaryota (Chatton, 1925) Whittaker & Margulis, 1978 (domain). Preserve intermediate groups in the full path: a short list of principal ranks can omit them.

      [10]
      Evidence for this statement

      EcoGenesis

      Where to check this statement

      classification55-P
      Installed classification: exact record, ancestor path and direct-child count. This is not a new phylogeny or a biological review.

      This index version contains 7 direct child records. This counts the next level of the tree, not all species, organisms, observations or studied genomes in the group.

      [10]
      Evidence for this statement

      EcoGenesis

      Where to check this statement

      classification55-P
      Installed classification: exact record, ancestor path and direct-child count. This is not a new phylogeny or a biological review.

      From group to species

      Prepared examples in this branch are Picea abies, Arabidopsis thaliana. Membership was checked in the same CoL release. Opening an example leads to its separate species record. Its geography, traits and sequences do not become properties of every member of the group.

      [10]
      Evidence for this statement

      EcoGenesis

      Where to check this statement

      classification55-P
      Installed classification: exact record, ancestor path and direct-child count. This is not a new phylogeny or a biological review.

      Next question

      Choose an example and frame a question at species or specimen level. On the map, preserve the exact filter and observation source; in molecular searches, preserve assembly, gene and sequence version. If a dataset is unavailable, leave the question open. A missing service response does not establish biological absence.

      Evidence for this statement

      EcoGenesis

        Continue exploring

        From this article to your own question

        Choose a statement in this article and open its evidence. Record whether it concerns the whole species, a particular specimen or specific study conditions. Then follow a suitable guide to preserve identifiers and state which evidence your question still needs.

        Evidence for this statement

        EcoGenesis

          Classification record and its scope

          Inspect structured data
          col id
          P
          scientific name
          Plantae
          rank
          kingdom
          parent id
          CS5HF
          child count
          7
          source release
          COL26.7 Base, 2026-07-14
          source sha256
          891457d62af389842924ef1de8bd6fbbdf9f6b03428ef5dd487bed4d04c0ace0
          classification semantics
          provider_source_classification_only
          phylogeny
          False
          lineage
          • col id
            CS5HF
            scientific name
            Eukaryota (Chatton, 1925) Whittaker & Margulis, 1978
            rank
            domain
            status
            accepted
          • col id
            P
            scientific name
            Plantae
            rank
            kingdom
            status
            accepted
          [10]
          Evidence for this statement

          Source annotation

          Where to check this statement

          classification55-P
          Installed classification: exact record, ancestor path and direct-child count. This is not a new phylogeny or a biological review.

          Continue exploring

          Sources and versions

          Editorial draft · human review pending

          1. One thousand plant transcriptomes and the phylogenomics of green plants

            2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

            Provenance and original
            Source version
            2019-10-23
            Reading scope
            selected_full_text_sections
            Location in the original source
            Abstract; Main; Integrated analysis; Land plants and angiosperm discussion; textual figure captions 1–4; publication metadata. Figures and supplements not inspected.
          2. Extensive epigenetic reprogramming during the life cycle of Marchantia polymorpha

            2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

            Provenance and original
            Source version
            2018-01-25
            Reading scope
            selected_full_text_sections
            Location in the original source
            Abstract; Background; Figure 1 caption only; initial Results on sampled tissues and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Did not adopt the outdated basal-liverwort phrasing.
          3. The genome of the seagrass Zostera marina reveals angiosperm adaptation to the sea

            2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

            Provenance and original
            Source version
            2016-01-27
            Reading scope
            selected_full_text_sections
            Location in the original source
            Abstract; Main on habitat and sequenced material; stomata, epidermal exchange and salinity discussion; rights paragraph. No figures or supplementary data inspected.
          4. Atomic Snapshots of Photosynthesis — U.S. Department of Energy

            2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

            Provenance and original
            Reading scope
            relevant_page_text_read
            Location in the original source
            The Science, The Impact, Summary, Publications; primary funder explanation of its supported research, not a new kingdom-wide experiment.
          5. Single cell genomics reveals plastid-lacking Picozoa are close relatives of red algae

            2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

            Provenance and original
            Source version
            2021-11-17
            Reading scope
            selected_full_text_sections
            Location in the original source
            Abstract and Introduction, including plastid ancestry, 43 single-cell genomes, Picozoa and competing evolutionary interpretations.
          6. DOE Explains...the Carbon Cycle

            2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

            Provenance and original
            Reading scope
            page_text_read
            Location in the original source
            Main explanatory text on photosynthesis, biomass, soil, decomposition and combustion; entire short explanatory page read.
          7. Footprints of parasitism in the genome of the parasitic flowering plant Cuscuta campestris

            2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

            Provenance and original
            Source version
            2018-06-28
            Reading scope
            selected_full_text_sections
            Location in the original source
            Abstract; Introduction; Karyology and genome characteristics; Figure 1 caption text, not its image.
          8. Assigned exact CoL identity — Plantae

            2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

            Provenance and original
            Source version
            COL26.7 Base, 2026-07-14
            Reading scope
            supplied_installed_row_read
            Location in the original source
            taxon_rows[taxon_id=P]: scientific_name, taxon_rank, taxonomic_status, nomenclatural_code, classification_scope; source_row 3700653
          9. Saved CoL classification — Plantae

            2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

            Provenance and original
            Source version
            COL26.7 Base, 2026-07-14
            Reading scope
            supplied_scientific_json_read
            Location in the original source
            sections[id=classification].claims[label=Source lineage] and [label=Source classification release]; full list and release object read
          10. Plantae · Catalogue of Life

            2026-09-19T12:02:54.209836+00:00 · Terms of use on source site

            Provenance and original
            Source version
            COL26.7 Base, 2026-07-14
            Original SHA-256
            891457d62af389842924ef1de8bd6fbbdf9f6b03428ef5dd487bed4d04c0ace0
            Source reading scope
            Installed classification: exact record, ancestor path and direct-child count. This is not a new phylogeny or a biological review.
            Location in the original source
            Installed classification: exact record, ancestor path and direct-child count. This is not a new phylogeny or a biological review.
          11. OpenStax 25.1 — Early Plant Life

            2026-09-19 · CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0

            Provenance and original
            Source version
            Biology 2e (2018); page inspected 2026-09-19
            Source reading scope
            Introduction, adaptations, alternating generations and embryo protection; Plantae boundaries remain classification-dependent.
            Location in the original source
            Introduction, adaptations, alternating generations and embryo protection; Plantae boundaries remain classification-dependent.
          Inspect structured data
          Content version
          aa85ebd844205dec1ae47f24931be7e2d871071854a7e7b519ff7253ee323607
          Source version
          editorial-source-set.v1@f336e10992321de71a7150a7f8a5ab1dc4bc3584a444a316388043539fcc9c9e;COL26.7@891457d62af389842924ef1de8bd6fbbdf9f6b03428ef5dd487bed4d04c0ace0
          Updated
          2026-10-01

          Where this organism has been observed

          Explore observations on the map →

          Observations and connections with other organisms

          Explore published sightings and reported interactions, such as feeding or pollination. Each record links to its source.

          Research about this organism

          01 · A place in the living world

          Classification

          Explore the tree of life
          1. DomainEukaryota (Chatton, 1925) Whittaker & Margulis, 1978
          2. KingdomPlantae

          02 · From organism to molecules

          Genes, genomes and proteins

          03 · Continue exploring

          Tools and connections

          04 · EcoGenesis

          What the available evidence supports

          Classification and name provenance.

          A catalogue name does not establish a genome, protein or measurement. Missing records do not mean a trait or gene is absent from the organism.

          Coverage updates as this page checks its sources.

          Sources and licences

          SourceIDLicenceDetails
          colP—Source record ↗