← Back to reading

Picea abies

In brief

Norway spruce, Picea abies, is an evergreen conifer in the pine family, Pinaceae. [1] [2]

Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S01
Accepted name and authorship; native and introduced distribution; accepted infraspecifics; classification; source and licence fields. Entire relevant record text read. WCVP/IPNI 2026 attribution, not a downloaded versioned backbone.
evidence:S02
Citation; Taxonomy; General Distribution; Site Characteristics; Botanical Description; Seasonal Development; Regeneration Processes; beginning of Successional Status. Written February 1994; historical taxonomy not treated as current.
Read the section →

Photographs and illustrations

Save, investigate and check this version

Editorial draft · human review pending

Ask about this material
On this page

Overview

Its native range is European, but planting has taken it well beyond that range, including into North America.

[1]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S01
Accepted name and authorship; native and introduced distribution; accepted infraspecifics; classification; source and licence fields. Entire relevant record text read. WCVP/IPNI 2026 attribution, not a downloaded versioned backbone.

It is a major forest tree in northern Europe and in European mountain regions, rather than a species confined to Norway.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S03
All three PDF pages, numbered 114–116: text, map legends, captions and references visually inspected in web screenshots; qualitative map scope checked, no underlying occurrence data read. Habitat and Ecology; Importance and Usage; Threats and Diseases.

Recognizing the tree

A straight trunk, a conical to columnar crown and drooping secondary branchlets give mature Norway spruce its characteristic outline.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S02
Citation; Taxonomy; General Distribution; Site Characteristics; Botanical Description; Seasonal Development; Regeneration Processes; beginning of Successional Status. Written February 1994; historical taxonomy not treated as current.

The rigid needles are four-angled in cross-section and about 1–2.5 cm long.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S03
All three PDF pages, numbered 114–116: text, map legends, captions and references visually inspected in web screenshots; qualitative map scope checked, no underlying occurrence data read. Habitat and Ecology; Importance and Usage; Threats and Diseases.

Young seed cones stand upright before pollination, then become pendant; by autumn they turn from green to brown.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S03
All three PDF pages, numbered 114–116: text, map legends, captions and references visually inspected in web screenshots; qualitative map scope checked, no underlying occurrence data read. Habitat and Ecology; Importance and Usage; Threats and Diseases.

The long, cylindrical cones open as they dry and release winged seeds.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S03
All three PDF pages, numbered 114–116: text, map legends, captions and references visually inspected in web screenshots; qualitative map scope checked, no underlying occurrence data read. Habitat and Ecology; Importance and Usage; Threats and Diseases.

From pollen to seedlings

Norway spruce bears separate pollen-producing and seed-bearing structures on the same tree, a condition called monoecy.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S03
All three PDF pages, numbered 114–116: text, map legends, captions and references visually inspected in web screenshots; qualitative map scope checked, no underlying occurrence data read. Habitat and Ecology; Importance and Usage; Threats and Diseases.

Wind carries conifer pollen between trees, while the winged seeds provide a later, separate opportunity for dispersal.

[4] [2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S04
Abstract; Main; Sequencing and assembly; Presence of long introns and gene-like fragments; selected figure-caption text. P.abies 1.0 historical study and sample Z4006 identified; not a current assembly endpoint verification.
evidence:S02
Citation; Taxonomy; General Distribution; Site Characteristics; Botanical Description; Seasonal Development; Regeneration Processes; beginning of Successional Status. Written February 1994; historical taxonomy not treated as current.

Seeds ripen in the year of pollination and may be released from late autumn into winter or retained until spring.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S02
Citation; Taxonomy; General Distribution; Site Characteristics; Botanical Description; Seasonal Development; Regeneration Processes; beginning of Successional Status. Written February 1994; historical taxonomy not treated as current.

Seed production varies with age and growing conditions; large crops are not necessarily annual.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S02
Citation; Taxonomy; General Distribution; Site Characteristics; Botanical Description; Seasonal Development; Regeneration Processes; beginning of Successional Status. Written February 1994; historical taxonomy not treated as current.

Young seedlings are vulnerable to drought and overheating, so germination alone does not guarantee establishment.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S02
Citation; Taxonomy; General Distribution; Site Characteristics; Botanical Description; Seasonal Development; Regeneration Processes; beginning of Successional Status. Written February 1994; historical taxonomy not treated as current.

In moist settings the tree can also reproduce by layering, when a low branch roots while still connected to its parent.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S02
Citation; Taxonomy; General Distribution; Site Characteristics; Botanical Description; Seasonal Development; Regeneration Processes; beginning of Successional Status. Written February 1994; historical taxonomy not treated as current.

A forest tree with partners below ground

Norway spruce tolerates shade and grows well in cool, moist conditions, although persistent waterlogging can inhibit growth.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S02
Citation; Taxonomy; General Distribution; Site Characteristics; Botanical Description; Seasonal Development; Regeneration Processes; beginning of Successional Status. Written February 1994; historical taxonomy not treated as current.

Its root system is often shallow, contributing to vulnerability to drought and windthrow.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S03
All three PDF pages, numbered 114–116: text, map legends, captions and references visually inspected in web screenshots; qualitative map scope checked, no underlying occurrence data read. Habitat and Ecology; Importance and Usage; Threats and Diseases.

The roots associate with ectomycorrhizal fungi, whose enzymes help mobilize nutrients from soil organic matter.

[5]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S06
Summary; Introduction; Methods plant material and fungal strains; Results prose on growth response around Figure 2. Tables and figure images not analysed; claims confined to qualitative experimental outcomes.

Experiments with Norway spruce seedlings found that a more diverse fungal community could broaden the range of nutrient-mobilizing enzymes, while growth responses depended on the seedlings and fungal partners involved.

[5]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S06
Summary; Introduction; Methods plant material and fungal strains; Results prose on growth response around Figure 2. Tables and figure images not analysed; claims confined to qualitative experimental outcomes.

Drought, resin and bark beetles

Resin is part of the tree’s defence: its chemical and physical properties can inhibit or trap attacking bark beetles.

[6]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S05
Summary; Introduction through study rationale; Results Q5–Q6 on induced terpenes, phenolics and carbohydrates. Selected table text was displayed but numerical tables were not used or audited.

The Eurasian spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus, also carries fungal associates that interact with the tree’s living bark and wood.

[6]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S05
Summary; Introduction through study rationale; Results Q5–Q6 on induced terpenes, phenolics and carbohydrates. Selected table text was displayed but numerical tables were not used or audited.

In a two-year rainfall-exclusion experiment, drought-stressed mature spruces experienced more beetle attacks and longer fungal lesions than controls.

[6]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S05
Summary; Introduction through study rationale; Results Q5–Q6 on induced terpenes, phenolics and carbohydrates. Selected table text was displayed but numerical tables were not used or audited.

Their terpene defences did not simply disappear, showing that susceptibility cannot be reduced to a single “drought switches off resin” explanation.

[6]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S05
Summary; Introduction through study rationale; Results Q5–Q6 on induced terpenes, phenolics and carbohydrates. Selected table text was displayed but numerical tables were not used or audited.

Why Norway spruce matters

Norway spruce supplies timber and pulpwood, and selected wood is used in soundboards and other musical-instrument components.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S03
All three PDF pages, numbered 114–116: text, map legends, captions and references visually inspected in web screenshots; qualitative map scope checked, no underlying occurrence data read. Habitat and Ecology; Importance and Usage; Threats and Diseases.

It has also become an important subject for understanding large conifer genomes.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S04
Abstract; Main; Sequencing and assembly; Presence of long introns and gene-like fragments; selected figure-caption text. P.abies 1.0 historical study and sample Z4006 identified; not a current assembly endpoint verification.

A 2013 genome study linked much of its enormous DNA content to the accumulation of repetitive mobile-element sequences, rather than a proportionately enormous number of protein-coding genes.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S04
Abstract; Main; Sequencing and assembly; Presence of long introns and gene-like fragments; selected figure-caption text. P.abies 1.0 historical study and sample Z4006 identified; not a current assembly endpoint verification.

Keep geographic and taxonomic scales separate

Kew accepts Picea abies (L.) H.Karst. and distinguishes its European native distribution from introductions into other regions.

[1]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S01
Accepted name and authorship; native and introduced distribution; accepted infraspecifics; classification; source and licence fields. Entire relevant record text read. WCVP/IPNI 2026 attribution, not a downloaded versioned backbone.

Its classification uses Streptophyta and Equisetopsida above Pinidae and Pinales, illustrating why an explicit source hierarchy matters when comparing taxonomic backbones.

[1]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S01
Accepted name and authorship; native and introduced distribution; accepted infraspecifics; classification; source and licence fields. Entire relevant record text read. WCVP/IPNI 2026 attribution, not a downloaded versioned backbone.

What the 2013 genome actually represented

Nystedt and colleagues sequenced material from the Norway spruce clone Z4006 and estimated a nuclear genome size of 19.6 Gb.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S04
Abstract; Main; Sequencing and assembly; Presence of long introns and gene-like fragments; selected figure-caption text. P.abies 1.0 historical study and sample Z4006 identified; not a current assembly endpoint verification.

Their P.abies 1.0 draft contained 4.3 Gb in scaffolds longer than 10 kb; that figure is a length-qualified assembly statistic, not a complete 19.6-Gb chromosome assembly.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S04
Abstract; Main; Sequencing and assembly; Presence of long introns and gene-like fragments; selected figure-caption text. P.abies 1.0 historical study and sample Z4006 identified; not a current assembly endpoint verification.

They also described a separate chloroplast genome and a draft mitochondrial genome, which should not be merged with nuclear assembly totals.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S04
Abstract; Main; Sequencing and assembly; Presence of long introns and gene-like fragments; selected figure-caption text. P.abies 1.0 historical study and sample Z4006 identified; not a current assembly endpoint verification.

Mechanisms need their experimental context

The drought experiment combined rainfall exclusion, beetle bioassays and fungal inoculation, rather than measuring the outcome of an uncontrolled regional mass outbreak.

[6]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S05
Summary; Introduction through study rationale; Results Q5–Q6 on induced terpenes, phenolics and carbohydrates. Selected table text was displayed but numerical tables were not used or audited.

Its results separate resin flow, chemical concentrations and fungal damage; these are related but non-identical measures of defence.

[6]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S05
Summary; Introduction through study rationale; Results Q5–Q6 on induced terpenes, phenolics and carbohydrates. Selected table text was displayed but numerical tables were not used or audited.

Likewise, seedling mycorrhizal experiments show context-dependent responses, not a guarantee that adding any fungal inoculant improves every spruce.

[5]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

evidence:S06
Summary; Introduction; Methods plant material and fungal strains; Results prose on growth response around Figure 2. Tables and figure images not analysed; claims confined to qualitative experimental outcomes.

Identity

Scientific name

Picea abies

[7]
Evidence for this statement

Source annotation

Where to check this statement

evidence:ID03
taxon_rows[taxon_id=4HPZF]: scientific_name, taxon_rank, taxonomic_status, nomenclatural_code, classification_scope; source_row 669106

Taxonomic rank

species

[7]
Evidence for this statement

Source annotation

Where to check this statement

evidence:ID03
taxon_rows[taxon_id=4HPZF]: scientific_name, taxon_rank, taxonomic_status, nomenclatural_code, classification_scope; source_row 669106

Provider status

accepted

[7]
Evidence for this statement

Source annotation

Where to check this statement

evidence:ID03
taxon_rows[taxon_id=4HPZF]: scientific_name, taxon_rank, taxonomic_status, nomenclatural_code, classification_scope; source_row 669106

col identifier

4HPZF

[7]
Evidence for this statement

Source annotation

Where to check this statement

evidence:ID03
taxon_rows[taxon_id=4HPZF]: scientific_name, taxon_rank, taxonomic_status, nomenclatural_code, classification_scope; source_row 669106

Classification

Source lineage

  1. Eukaryota (Chatton, 1925) Whittaker & Margulis, 1978 domain
  2. Plantae kingdom
  3. Pteridobiotina Britton & Brown subkingdom
  4. Tracheophyta phylum
  5. Pinopsida Burnett class
  6. Pinidae Cronquist, Takht. & W.Zimm. subclass
  7. Pinales Gorozh. order
  8. Pinaceae Spreng. ex Rudolphi family
  9. Picea A.Dietr. genus
  10. Picea abies (L.) H.Karst. species
[8]
Evidence for this statement

Source annotation

Where to check this statement

evidence:BL03
sections[id=classification].claims[label=Source lineage] and [label=Source classification release]; full list and release object read

This is the source’s classification, not an inferred species phylogeny.

Source classification release

Inspect structured data
classification semantics
provider_source_classification_only
phylogeny
False
release
COL26.7 Base, 2026-07-14
Source
Catalogue of Life / ChecklistBank
source sha256
891457d62af389842924ef1de8bd6fbbdf9f6b03428ef5dd487bed4d04c0ace0
metadata reports source sha256 verified
True
source sha256 independently recomputed in this delivery
False
verification scope
Saved scientific JSON release metadata; installed exact row additionally read
[8]
Evidence for this statement

Source annotation

Where to check this statement

evidence:BL03
sections[id=classification].claims[label=Source lineage] and [label=Source classification release]; full list and release object read

This is the source’s classification, not an inferred species phylogeny.

From this article to your own question

Choose a statement in this article and open its evidence. Record whether it concerns the whole species, a particular specimen or specific study conditions. Then follow a suitable guide to preserve identifiers and state which evidence your question still needs.

Evidence for this statement

EcoGenesis

    Continue exploring

    Sources and versions

    Editorial draft · human review pending

    1. Picea abies (L.) H.Karst. — Plants of the World Online

      2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

      Provenance and original
      Reading scope
      visible_record_fields_read
      Location in the original source
      Accepted name and authorship; native and introduced distribution; accepted infraspecifics; classification; source and licence fields. Entire relevant record text read. WCVP/IPNI 2026 attribution, not a downloaded versioned backbone.
    2. Picea abies, Norway spruce — Fire Effects Information System

      2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

      Provenance and original
      Source version
      1994-02
      Reading scope
      selected_page_sections_read
      Location in the original source
      Citation; Taxonomy; General Distribution; Site Characteristics; Botanical Description; Seasonal Development; Regeneration Processes; beginning of Successional Status. Written February 1994; historical taxonomy not treated as current.
    3. Picea abies in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats — European Atlas of Forest Tree Species

      2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

      Provenance and original
      Source version
      2016
      Reading scope
      three_page_pdf_read_and_visually_checked
      Location in the original source
      All three PDF pages, numbered 114–116: text, map legends, captions and references visually inspected in web screenshots; qualitative map scope checked, no underlying occurrence data read. Habitat and Ecology; Importance and Usage; Threats and Diseases.
    4. The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution

      2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

      Provenance and original
      Source version
      2013-05-22
      Reading scope
      selected_full_text_sections
      Location in the original source
      Abstract; Main; Sequencing and assembly; Presence of long introns and gene-like fragments; selected figure-caption text. P.abies 1.0 historical study and sample Z4006 identified; not a current assembly endpoint verification.
    5. Profiling functions of ectomycorrhizal diversity and root structuring in seedlings of Norway spruce (Picea abies) with fast- and slow-growing phenotypes

      2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

      Provenance and original
      Source version
      2013-10-14
      Reading scope
      selected_full_text_sections
      Location in the original source
      Summary; Introduction; Methods plant material and fungal strains; Results prose on growth response around Figure 2. Tables and figure images not analysed; claims confined to qualitative experimental outcomes.
    6. Drought increases Norway spruce susceptibility to the Eurasian spruce bark beetle and its associated fungi

      2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

      Provenance and original
      Source version
      2024
      Reading scope
      selected_full_text_sections
      Location in the original source
      Summary; Introduction through study rationale; Results Q5–Q6 on induced terpenes, phenolics and carbohydrates. Selected table text was displayed but numerical tables were not used or audited.
    7. Assigned exact CoL identity — Picea abies

      2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

      Provenance and original
      Source version
      COL26.7 Base, 2026-07-14
      Reading scope
      supplied_installed_row_read
      Location in the original source
      taxon_rows[taxon_id=4HPZF]: scientific_name, taxon_rank, taxonomic_status, nomenclatural_code, classification_scope; source_row 669106
    8. Saved CoL classification — Picea abies

      2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

      Provenance and original
      Source version
      COL26.7 Base, 2026-07-14
      Reading scope
      supplied_scientific_json_read
      Location in the original source
      sections[id=classification].claims[label=Source lineage] and [label=Source classification release]; full list and release object read
    Inspect structured data
    Content version
    474922d5790305ca33cc47eb000ee8afc9430efbdb07f20fc5e5e90da2d9a800
    Source version
    editorial-source-set.v1@0faf120fb821b3c12d9db369b3cb3fc61b95c280155d36325d099a6b06dff992
    Updated
    2026-10-01

    Where this organism has been observed

    Explore observations on the map →

    Observations and connections with other organisms

    Explore published sightings and reported interactions, such as feeding or pollination. Each record links to its source.

    Research about this organism

    01 · A place in the living world

    Classification

    Explore the tree of life
    1. DomainEukaryota (Chatton, 1925) Whittaker & Margulis, 1978
    2. KingdomPlantae
    3. SubkingdomPteridobiotina Britton & Brown
    4. PhylumTracheophyta
    5. ClassPinopsida Burnett
    6. SubclassPinidae Cronquist, Takht. & W.Zimm.
    7. OrderPinales Gorozh.
    8. FamilyPinaceae Spreng. ex Rudolphi
    9. GenusPicea A.Dietr.
    10. SpeciesPicea abies

    02 · From organism to molecules

    Genes, genomes and proteins

    03 · Continue exploring

    Tools and connections

    04 · EcoGenesis

    What the available evidence supports

    Classification and name provenance; a source-attributed description.

    A catalogue name does not establish a genome, protein or measurement. Missing records do not mean a trait or gene is absent from the organism.

    Coverage updates as this page checks its sources.

    Sources and licences

    SourceIDLicenceDetails
    col4HPZF—Source record ↗
    Wikipedia471880CC-BY-SA-4.0Description version ↗