← Back to reading

Caenorhabditis elegans

In brief

Caenorhabditis elegans is a nematode: a small, free-living roundworm with a transparent body. [1] [2]

Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C1
    locator
    Rank and Lineage(full): Nematoda
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C1
  • source id
    C2
    locator
    Introduction, lines 65–67
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C2
Read the section →

Photographs and illustrations

Save, investigate and check this version

Editorial draft · human review pending

Ask about this material
On this page

Overview

It feeds on microbes and can reproduce in patches of decomposing plant material, linking its life cycle to short-lived food supplies.

[3] [4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C3
    locator
    Results: habitats, lines 85–111; Conclusions, lines 244–246
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C3
  • source id
    C4
    locator
    Opening summary, lines 52–55
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C4

A transparent body with specialised organs

An adult is about one millimetre long, with a protective cuticle outside the epidermis.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C2
    locator
    Introduction, line 65; section 5.1, lines 158–160
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C2

Body-wall muscles generate its characteristic bending movements; inside are digestive, reproductive and excretory systems.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C2
    locator
    Sections 5 and 5.2, lines 154–156, 172–173
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C2

Its transparency makes internal cells visible under suitable microscopy rather than leaving the animal as an opaque silhouette.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C2
    locator
    Introduction, lines 66–67
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C2

How it eats

A muscular pharynx connects the mouth to the intestine and draws in liquid containing bacterial particles.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C4
    locator
    Opening summary, lines 52–54
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C4

Repeated contractions retain particles while excess liquid is expelled; movements farther back carry food towards the intestine.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C4
    locator
    Opening summary; section 1.3, line 147
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C4

A grinder in the terminal bulb helps break up bacteria before they enter the intestine.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C4
    locator
    Figure 2 caption: terminal bulb grinder
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C4

Food quality matters as well as quantity: different bacteria can support growth differently, and worms can change their feeding behaviour accordingly.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C4
    locator
    Opening summary, line 55
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C4

Reproduction and development

The species has self-fertilising hermaphrodites and males.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C2
    locator
    Section 2.2, line 91
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C2

A hermaphrodite first produces sperm, then eggs, and can also mate with a male.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C2
    locator
    Section 2.2, lines 91–93, 107
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C2

Hermaphrodites have two X chromosomes, whereas males normally have one and no Y chromosome.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C2
    locator
    Section 2.2, line 92
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C2

After embryonic development, the worm passes through four larval stages, L1 to L4, before adulthood.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C2
    locator
    Section 2.3, lines 109–111
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C2

Each larval stage ends in a molt that replaces the cuticle.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C2
    locator
    Section 2.3, line 110
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C2

When conditions deteriorate, developing larvae can instead enter dauer, a non-feeding, stress-resistant alternative to the usual third larval stage.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C3
    locator
    Background, lines 77–78
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C3

Dauer is reversible: favourable conditions allow feeding and development towards adulthood to resume.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C3
    locator
    Background, line 78
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C3

Life beyond the laboratory

Field sampling in France found C. elegans reproducing in rotten fruits and herbaceous stems, sometimes alongside C. briggsae.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C3
    locator
    Results: habitats, lines 85–111
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C3

Some populations contained actively developing worms without any dauer larvae, while larger populations included pre-dauer or dauer stages.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C3
    locator
    Results: Populations differ by their developmental stage composition, lines 123–129
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C3

These observations support a life history with periods of growth in food-rich patches interrupted by pauses and dispersal, rather than permanent dormancy in soil.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C3
    locator
    Discussion, lines 207–214; Conclusions, lines 244–246
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C3

Why researchers study it

The combination of transparency and a reproducible developmental lineage makes it possible to follow the fate of individual cells in a living animal.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C2
    locator
    Introduction, lines 67, 73; section 4, line 140
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C2

Its feeding apparatus also connects a visible behaviour to a small neuromuscular system, allowing questions about movement and its control to be studied together.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C4
    locator
    Opening summary, lines 52–54; section 1.3, lines 147–153
    evidence id
    editorial-source:C4

Keep identity separate from appearance

NCBI places Taxonomy ID 6239 at species rank under Caenorhabditis; the closely related C. briggsae in the field study is a different species.

[1] [3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C1
    locator
    Taxonomy ID; Rank; Lineage(full)
  • source id
    C3
    locator
    Background; Methods: species identification, lines 253–259

Félix and Duveau used mating or molecular tests because the two species could not reliably be separated by their similar morphology.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C3
    locator
    Methods: Nematode sampling and isolation, lines 253–259

Interpret a population snapshot

The authors recorded abundance and developmental stages in fresh field samples.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C3
    locator
    Results: Populations differ, lines 123–129; Methods, lines 248–250

Colonisation, reproduction and dauer dispersal form an interpretation of these snapshots, not continuous tracking between patches.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C3
    locator
    Discussion: Individual and population stage, lines 207–214

Distinguish the feeding movements

Pharyngeal pumping and posterior-isthmus peristalsis are distinct movements; the latter follows only some pumps and transports retained food rearwards.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C4
    locator
    Section 1.3, lines 147–150

Consequently, counting visible pumps alone does not directly measure every step of food transport into the intestine.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • source id
    C4
    locator
    Opening summary; section 1.3, lines 147–150

From this article to your own question

Choose a statement in this article and open its evidence. Record whether it concerns the whole species, a particular specimen or specific study conditions. Then follow a suitable guide to preserve identifiers and state which evidence your question still needs.

Evidence for this statement

EcoGenesis

    Continue exploring

    Sources and versions

    Editorial draft · human review pending

    1. NCBI Taxonomy: Caenorhabditis elegans (Taxonomy ID 6239)

      2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

      Provenance and original
      Location in the original source
      Taxonomy ID; current name; Rank; Lineage(full), lines 19–35; nomenclature disclaimer
    2. Corsi, Wightman and Chalfie: A Transparent window into biology: A primer on Caenorhabditis elegans

      2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

      Provenance and original
      Location in the original source
      Introduction, lines 65–75; sections 2.1–2.3, lines 81–113; section 4, lines 140–150; sections 5–5.2, lines 154–177; section 5.5, lines 201–209
    3. Félix and Duveau (2012), Population dynamics and habitat sharing of natural populations of Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae

      2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

      Provenance and original
      Location in the original source
      Background, lines 73–84; Results: habitats, population stages and sex/food, lines 85–140; Discussion: Individual and population stage, lines 207–214; Conclusions, lines 244–247; Methods: identification, lines 248–261
    4. Avery and You (2012), C. elegans feeding

      2026-09-06 · Reuse permission unverified

      Provenance and original
      Location in the original source
      Opening biological summary, lines 52–55; section 1.3 Isthmus peristalsis, lines 146–154; Figure 2 caption at /books/NBK116080/figure/feeding_figure2/
    Inspect structured data
    Content version
    1766012bfa63dde1124807ae55edd2c87b47a97cdffbdfe19081e0b8d33e1268
    Source version
    editorial-source-set.v1@f6fcd6c9f339b65d367a1a1323977b47ef2437c0262ee976363b2b23b2af1ab9
    Updated
    2026-10-01

    Where this organism has been observed

    Explore observations on the map →

    Observations and connections with other organisms

    Explore published sightings and reported interactions, such as feeding or pollination. Each record links to its source.

    Research about this organism

    01 · A place in the living world

    Classification

    Explore the tree of life
    1. No rankcellular organisms
    2. DomainEukaryota
    3. CladeOpisthokonta
    4. KingdomMetazoa
    5. CladeEumetazoa
    6. CladeBilateria
    7. CladeProtostomia
    8. CladeEcdysozoa
    9. PhylumNematoda
    10. ClassChromadorea
    11. OrderRhabditida
    12. SuborderRhabditina
    13. InfraorderRhabditomorpha
    14. SuperfamilyRhabditoidea
    15. FamilyRhabditidae
    16. SubfamilyPeloderinae
    17. GenusCaenorhabditis
    18. SpeciesCaenorhabditis elegans

    02 · From organism to molecules

    Genes, genomes and proteins

    03 · Continue exploring

    Tools and connections

    04 · EcoGenesis

    What the available evidence supports

    Classification and name provenance; a source-attributed description.

    A catalogue name does not establish a genome, protein or measurement. Missing records do not mean a trait or gene is absent from the organism.

    Coverage updates as this page checks its sources.

    Sources and licences

    SourceIDLicenceDetails
    UniProt Taxonomy6239CC-BY-4.0Source record ↗
    UniProt Taxonomy6239CC-BY-4.0Description version ↗