← Back to reading

Mus musculus

In brief

The house mouse, Mus musculus, is a rodent in the family Muridae. [1]

Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-N
    locator
    Common name; rank; lineage: Rodentia and Muridae
Read the section →

Photographs and illustrations

Save, investigate and check this version

Editorial draft · human review pending

Ask about this material
On this page

Introduction

Its close association with people has helped it spread widely, but it also lives outside buildings.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-D
    locator
    Summary; Habitat Description

Recognizing a house mouse

A pointed muzzle, rounded ears, long whiskers and a long tail give the house mouse its characteristic outline.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-D
    locator
    Species Description

Wild coat colours range from light brown to black, with paler or differently coloured fur on the underside.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-D
    locator
    Species Description: coat colour

From pregnancy to an independent young mouse

House mice reproduce sexually and develop before birth as placental mammals.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-D
    locator
    Reproduction: placental; sexual

Laboratory reference estimates put gestation at about 19–21 days, while emphasizing that strain and environmental conditions affect reproductive values.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-J
    locator
    Mouse Physiology source/variation note; Reproduction: gestation

Mothers give birth to litters, whose size varies with genetics, conditions and maternal age rather than following one fixed number.

[3]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-J
    locator
    Reproduction: litter-size variation

Newborn pups have little visible hair and closed eyes and ears.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-S
    locator
    4.4.1 Postnatal development

Fur and sensory function develop after birth, and pups begin trying solid food while nursing can still continue.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-S
    locator
    4.4.1 Postnatal development

This makes weaning a transition from milk to independent feeding, not an instantaneous change on one universal birthday.

[4]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-S
    locator
    4.4.1 Postnatal development: overlapping solid feeding and nursing

Breeding can continue through the year in sheltered commensal populations, whereas reproduction in free-living populations is often seasonal.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-D
    locator
    Lifecycle Stages; Reproduction

Food and responses to the environment

House mice eat plant material and can also take insects and other animal food.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-D
    locator
    Nutrition

Human food stores provide another resource, but mice also occupy grasslands, dunes and agricultural habitats.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-D
    locator
    Habitat Description; Nutrition

Their foraging decisions respond to environmental cues rather than simply to the presence of food.

[5]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-F
    locator
    Abstract; Results: Field Experiment

In a New Zealand field experiment, fewer seeds were removed from illuminated stations than from dark stations.

[5]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-F
    locator
    Results: Field Experiment

This supports a role for light in where the tested mice chose to forage, without showing that artificial light eliminates their need to feed.

[5]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-F
    locator
    Discussion opening; field result versus total foraging effort

An ecological participant and a research organism

House mice can damage crops and food supplies, and introduced populations can harm native organisms on islands.

[2]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-D
    locator
    Summary; General Impacts

They are also important in research on mammalian genetics and physiology.

[7]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-G
    locator
    Main opening: model uses

A study of 460 wild house mice from 12 southern-UK sites found marked differences in immune state among populations.

[6]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-I
    locator
    Results: Wild mouse populations differ immunologically

Age and body condition helped explain variation, showing why laboratory findings alone cannot describe every mouse living in a changing environment.

[6]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-I
    locator
    Abstract; Introduction; Discussion

Genome research now extends beyond the early C57BL/6J reference: a 2025 study reconstructed chromosome-scale genomes for C57BL/6J and CAST/EiJ and resolved previously missing chromosome ends and centromeric regions.

[7]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-G
    locator
    Main; Results opening

The differences between these strain genomes are part of mouse biological diversity, not errors that can be removed by treating one strain as the entire species.

[7]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-G
    locator
    Abstract; Discussion closing

Sample identity behind a genome

The 2025 assemblies were derived from an embryonic stem-cell line originating from a male CAST/EiJ × C57BL/6J F1 embryo.

[7]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-G
    locator
    Methods: Mice; Results opening

Parental short reads were used to assign long reads to their parental haplotypes before assembly.

[7]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-G
    locator
    Results opening: trio-based genome assembly

The paper lists BioProject PRJEB47108 and assembly identifiers GCA_964188535 and GCA_964188545, without an accession-version suffix in that Data availability statement.

[7]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-G
    locator
    Data availability

Measure foraging, not an assumed meal

Farnworth and colleagues counted seeds removed because they could not determine whether every missing seed had been eaten or cached.

[5]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-F
    locator
    Methods: Field experiment — Test procedures

Their captive comparison used adult male C57BL/6 mice, whereas the field arm studied free-living mice at Maungatautari.

[5]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-F
    locator
    Methods: Captive Experiments — Mouse curation; Field Experiments

Those sampling contexts should remain separate even when both show avoidance of illuminated feeding patches.

[5]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-F
    locator
    Abstract; Results: within-pen and Field Experiment

What immune variation means

The southern-UK immune study was cross-sectional and sampled M. musculus domesticus, including commensal animals in farm buildings.

[6]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-I
    locator
    Results: Wild mouse populations differ immunologically; Discussion closing

The authors explicitly note that the temporal stability of population differences requires longitudinal study.

[6]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-I
    locator
    Discussion opening: temporal stability limitation

An association between condition, age and immune measurements therefore does not by itself establish a universal causal rule for all mice.

[6]
Evidence for this statement

Editorial synthesis

Where to check this statement

  • evidence id
    A09-I
    locator
    Discussion: model alternatives, compartments and temporal limitations

From this article to your own question

Choose a statement in this article and open its evidence. Record whether it concerns the whole species, a particular specimen or specific study conditions. Then follow a suitable guide to preserve identifiers and state which evidence your question still needs.

Evidence for this statement

EcoGenesis

    Continue exploring

    Sources and versions

    Editorial draft · human review pending

    1. NCBI Taxonomy · 10090

      2026-09-06 · No source asset reused.

      Provenance and original
      Location in the original source
      Taxonomy ID, name, common name, rank, lineage and disclaimer.
    2. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group / GISD · Mus musculus

      2026-09-06 · No specific image reuse permission verified; no source assets copied.

      Provenance and original
      Location in the original source
      Species Description; Summary; Lifecycle Stages; Habitat Description; Reproduction; Nutrition; General Impacts; publication and compiler fields.
    3. Mouse Genome Informatics / The Jackson Laboratory · https://www.informatics.jax.org/mgihome/other/mouse_facts1.shtml

      2026-09-06 · No source asset reused; no general republication license established.

      Provenance and original
      Location in the original source
      Mouse Physiology: source note, strain-variation warning and Reproduction.
    4. Mouse Genome Informatics / The Jackson Laboratory · https://www.informatics.jax.org/silver/chapters/4-4.shtml

      2026-09-06 · No asset copied; no book republication grant verified.

      Provenance and original
      Location in the original source
      4.4.1 Postnatal development, complete subsection.
    5. PLOS ONE · 10.1371/journal.pone.0145432

      2026-09-06 · Creative Commons Attribution License stated; precise version not independently checked.

      Provenance and original
      Location in the original source
      Abstract; Introduction; Methods: Giving-Up Densities, captive mouse curation, field experimental design/test procedures/data analysis; Results: within-pen and Field Experiment; Discussion opening; copyright.
    6. PLOS Biology · 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003538

      2026-09-06 · No asset reused; precise license version not checked in this pass.

      Provenance and original
      Location in the original source
      Abstract; Author summary; Introduction; Results: Wild mouse populations differ immunologically; Discussion.
    7. Nature Genetics · 10.1038/s41588-025-02367-z

      2026-09-06 · CC BY 4.0; third-party credit exclusions apply.

      Provenance and original
      Location in the original source
      Abstract; Main; opening Results on sequencing, phasing and assembly; Discussion closing; Methods: Mice; Data availability; Rights and permissions; bibliographic dates.
    Inspect structured data
    Content version
    9cef80aa8ccab71eb686752a7c02e5d13d9c81b01e94599e522a2dca30a2848e
    Source version
    editorial-source-set.v1@22b7afd1a2259b7b3a932c6bd541e7b141f1bf5bc0b740dfac5e68bc61d7defc
    Updated
    2026-09-19

    Where this organism has been observed

    Explore observations on the map →

    Observations and connections with other organisms

    Explore published sightings and reported interactions, such as feeding or pollination. Each record links to its source.

    Research about this organism

    01 · A place in the living world

    Classification

    Explore the tree of life
    1. No rankcellular organisms
    2. DomainEukaryota
    3. CladeOpisthokonta
    4. KingdomMetazoa
    5. CladeEumetazoa
    6. CladeBilateria
    7. CladeDeuterostomia
    8. PhylumChordata
    9. SubphylumCraniata
    10. CladeVertebrata
    11. CladeGnathostomata
    12. CladeTeleostomi
    13. CladeEuteleostomi
    14. SuperclassSarcopterygii
    15. CladeDipnotetrapodomorpha
    16. CladeTetrapoda
    17. CladeAmniota
    18. ClassMammalia
    19. CladeTheria
    20. CladeEutheria
    21. CladeBoreoeutheria
    22. SuperorderEuarchontoglires
    23. CladeGlires
    24. OrderRodentia
    25. SuborderMyomorpha
    26. CladeMuroidea
    27. FamilyMuridae
    28. SubfamilyMurinae
    29. GenusMus
    30. SubgenusMus
    31. SpeciesMus musculus

    02 · From organism to molecules

    Genes, genomes and proteins

    03 · Continue exploring

    Tools and connections

    04 · EcoGenesis

    What the available evidence supports

    Classification and name provenance; a source-attributed description.

    A catalogue name does not establish a genome, protein or measurement. Missing records do not mean a trait or gene is absent from the organism.

    Coverage updates as this page checks its sources.

    Sources and licences

    SourceIDLicenceDetails
    UniProt Taxonomy10090CC-BY-4.0Source record ↗
    UniProt Taxonomy10090CC-BY-4.0Description version ↗