Gene, transcript and protein: connecting the records
In brief
A molecular story can be represented by several records. A gene is described on a genomic sequence; a transcript represents an RNA product; a protein record describes an amino-acid sequence. RefSeq holds genomic, transcript and protein sequences as distinct connected objects. Begin by identifying which object you have opened. [1]
Evidence for this statement
Source-based explanation
Where to check this statement
- guide-source-1
- Official record-type, accession/version and linked-transcript descriptions; dynamic database totals are not included.
Save, investigate and check this version
Editorial draft · human review pending
Ask about this materialOn this page
Read and explore
For a protein-coding eukaryotic gene, compare the transcripts and their exons. Mature RNA can contain untranslated regions, whereas CDS identifies the coding portion. Its entire length therefore need not be three times the protein length. Check the protein linked to the selected transcript. NCBI provides these links, but does not create separate prokaryotic RefSeq transcript records in the same way.
[2]Evidence for this statement
Source-based explanation
Where to check this statement
- guide-source-2
- Official guidance on linked transcripts. Separate RefSeq transcript records are not assumed for all prokaryotes.
A symbol such as BRCA2 is convenient for reading. Reproducible comparisons also need the organism, identifier, version and assembly. A sequence accession identifies a record; its version suffix specifies the sequence version. Coordinates belong to an assembly. A matching gene name alone is not enough to transfer a selected region between assemblies.
[3]Evidence for this statement
Source-based explanation
Where to check this statement
- guide-source-3
- Official record-type, accession/version and linked-transcript descriptions; dynamic database totals are not included.
Annotation provenance matters too. In RefSeq, XM_/XP_ identify model records and differ from NM_/NP_. These labels describe the record's origin rather than a simple “correct” or “incorrect” verdict. A transcript update need not change its protein sequence, so the two version numbers can differ.
[4]Evidence for this statement
Source-based explanation
Where to check this statement
- guide-source-4
- Official record-type, accession/version and linked-transcript descriptions; dynamic database totals are not included.
Try the route
Try it. In BRCA2, choose an available transcript, locate its CDS and open the linked protein. Save the selected identifiers, assembly version and region. Repeat the reading with FLC. Then open DnaA and check the strain designation: K-12 and MG1655 must not be silently substituted. If a separate transcript record is not provided, record that as a state of the available data.
Evidence for this statement
EcoGenesis learning activity
Check exact identity
Check your understanding. A matching symbol does not prove sequence identity. Different protein lengths first call for checking isoform, coverage and record identity before suggesting a biological explanation.
Evidence for this statement
EcoGenesis learning activity
From gene to protein
Possible record relationships for a protein-coding eukaryotic gene. The source determines the actual transcripts and products of the selected gene.
Evidence for this statement
EcoGenesis learning activity
Genomic locus
First preserve the assembly, sequence version and coordinates. Below are two illustrative protein-coding transcripts from one locus: a reading example, not an annotation of a particular gene.
RNA A: UTR · CDS · UTR
UTRs belong to the transcript but lie outside its protein-coding CDS. Find the transcript accession, version and CDS relationship in the source record. No lengths are shown here.
RNA B: UTR · CDS · UTR
A second transcript needs its own record. A gene symbol alone does not establish its existence or a different product: read the actual variants and relationships in the selected annotation.
Product A
Follow an explicit protein-sequence link and retain its accession/version. The protein name alone does not identify the selected transcript.
Product B
Check whether the source distinguishes this product from A. Two transcripts do not necessarily produce different amino-acid sequences.
- Genomic locus → RNA A: UTR · CDS · UTR: Illustrative variant A
- Genomic locus → RNA B: UTR · CDS · UTR: Illustrative variant B
- RNA A: UTR · CDS · UTR → Product A: CDS product; verify the record link
- RNA B: UTR · CDS · UTR → Product B: CDS product; verify the record link
Worked result: keep separate rows
A completed teaching note can have a gene row G, transcript rows T1 and T2, and protein rows P1 and P2. The arrows describe the mappings supplied in the example. Two transcript rows are not two genes, and a matching label is not a confirmed mapping. In a real comparison, add assembly, accession and version to the appropriate row; leave a missing correspondence explicitly unresolved.
Evidence for this statement
EcoGenesis
Continue with an organism
The photographs and molecular record come from separate source materials.
Your research question
Save the article to return to your question and this source version.
Plan a test
This is your research plan. Completing these fields does not confirm a hypothesis.
Sources and versions
Editorial draft · human review pending
- NCBI RefSeq
2026-09-19 · Terms of use on source site
Provenance and original
- Source version
- Page checked 19 September 2026; no immutable provider release asserted
- Source reading scope
- Official record-type, accession/version and linked-transcript descriptions; dynamic database totals are not included.
- Location in the original source
- Official record-type, accession/version and linked-transcript descriptions; dynamic database totals are not included.
- Moving from NCBI Gene to RNA and protein
2026-09-19 · Terms of use on source site
Provenance and original
- Source version
- Page checked 19 September 2026; no immutable provider release asserted
- Source reading scope
- Official guidance on linked transcripts. Separate RefSeq transcript records are not assumed for all prokaryotes.
- Location in the original source
- Official guidance on linked transcripts. Separate RefSeq transcript records are not assumed for all prokaryotes.
- Understanding GenBank record fields
2026-09-19 · Terms of use on source site
Provenance and original
- Source version
- Page checked 19 September 2026; no immutable provider release asserted
- Source reading scope
- Official record-type, accession/version and linked-transcript descriptions; dynamic database totals are not included.
- Location in the original source
- Official record-type, accession/version and linked-transcript descriptions; dynamic database totals are not included.
- RefSeq explanations
2026-09-19 · Terms of use on source site
Provenance and original
- Source version
- Page checked 19 September 2026; no immutable provider release asserted
- Source reading scope
- Official record-type, accession/version and linked-transcript descriptions; dynamic database totals are not included.
- Location in the original source
- Official record-type, accession/version and linked-transcript descriptions; dynamic database totals are not included.
Inspect structured data
- Content version
- 5943f63b30ed3c0b89dc7940beda2fcfdebe5d903605de032c1d36180d44a566
- Source version
- guides-20260919@cd1e4a0a6f0c71995fb6e076b59bd2ee930c2104150357fab50fc56f5f6e80fe
- Updated
- 2026-10-01